Sunday, January 16, 2011
Off-the-Cuff Contest Entry #2
I am the Lion, Lord of these lands.
I am the fiercest of beasts. All tremor in my presence, not because I will destroy them, but because I could, if I wanted to. Brute strength and handsome features aside, it is my cunning instincts that put me in that class by myself.
Those instincts guide me. I trust them.
As I lie in wait, I am calm, no fear betrays my face.
When the time comes, I will pounce. Attack. Intimidate, if needed. Assert myself. Prove again why I am the Lion.
The one everyone wants in their corner....
The door swings open.
"Mr. Mitchel? Mr. Stephenson and his team are ready for you. Good luck with your pitch, sir."
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Off-the-Cuff Contest Entry #1
This isn't the exact photo prompt from yesterday's 15 For 15 Contest (read contest explanation here), but it's close enough. In the original, the trees have no leaves, taken in wintertime. The following is my entry, written (per the contest rules) in only 15 minutes. The goal is not to have a polished, typo-free piece. There are plenty of places I would have liked to tighten up, but didn't have the time. So, here it is, raw, by-the-seat-of-my-pants writing. :D |
Marcus dragged on the cigarette pinched between his index finger and thumb. Numbing cold seeped through his britches from the park bench, despite its position in full sun, but he didn't mind. He'd rather sit here all day than return to work. When you rinse four star restaurant slop off fine China all day, you face your 'have-not' reality every minute of every hour. It wore him down. His fifteen minute break was more valuable to him than the restaurant's finest bottle of wine.
He blew a plume of smoke downwind and his eyes fell on the man making his way up the path. Marcus narrowed his eyes. The man's utilitarian clothing appeared too big for his frame and hung on his body like a sack. His bald head was dropped back and he stared straight up at the sky as he walked. As he neared Marcus's bench, the toe of his black rubber shoe hit a rock and he stumbled.
"Eh. Watch where you're going, dumb ass," Marcus said.
The man leveled his gaze. He was younger than Marcus had first thought. His drawn skin and stubbled chin suggested mid-forties, but now Marcus decided he couldn't be older than thirty.
"Yeah. Thanks," the man said. "It's just the sky is so blue. And those trees, well, they're things of beauty."
Marcus looked up. The trees looked dead to him. Leafless. Cold. "Whatever, man," he said, looking across the park to the restaurant. By his watch, he had five more minutes before he had to get back.
"Mind if I sit down?"
Marcus saw the man still stood there. He motioned his indifference.
"I just got out of the slammer," the man said, sitting.
An eyebrow shot up. He had Marcus's attention. "You were in prison?"
"Yeah, ten years, man."
"What'd you do?"
"I was convicted of attempted murder. But it was bullshit. Someone tried to whack my wife. They pinned it on me."
Marcus raised his chin. "No kidding. That sucks, man."
The man chuckled, but there was no humor in the sound. "Shit. Ten years is a long time to not see trees. I can't stop looking at them."
"You served your whole sentence?"
"Nope. Turns out my wife's boyfriend did it. Thank God for all that fancy DNA testing they can do now. Found out a week ago, and today I'm free. Just like that."
"Your wife's boyfriend...?" Marcus asked while checking his watch. He had to get back. "That's some story. Glad you're out. I gotta get back to work." He offered his hand as he stood to leave.
The man shook it. Marcus took a few steps then turned to look over his shoulder.
"What's the first thing you're going to do, now that you're a free man?" Marcus asked.
The man smiled a churlish grin, cold as the trees. "First thing I'm gonna do is kill my wife."
Labels:
15 For 15,
Fiction,
Off-the-Cuff,
Writing
Friday, January 14, 2011
Enough, Cold in Hotlanta
Usually, I root for the underdog. But we've been holed up by winter storm conditions for a week now, so I'm cheering on the sun. (Sorry, neighborhood snowmen.)
The sun's shining bright over Atlanta as I type, and temperatures are supposed to climb above freezing through the weekend.
I'm ready for a return to normalcy!
Hoping you have a wonderful, warm, productive weekend!
Labels:
Update
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Snowed In
Thanks to the extreme winter conditions down here in Atlanta, my daily life has come to a near standstill for days. The kids are still home from school today, but hubby has left for work for the first time all week. I don't know about you, but when the whole family is home, regardless of the day of the week, my brain goes into weekend mode.
I haven't been online for longer than five minutes since last Friday. I look forward to reading some blogs today!
As for my own blog, I will keep this short with just a couple updates.
First, I have a new email account which will replace the one I have been using [heftynicki(at)writing(dot)com] for all my writerly correspondences. The writing dot com email account will not close and I check it several times a day, so no worries if you contact me through that site. But my new, "professional" email account will now be: NicoleDucleroir(at)gmail(dot)com.
Second, today begins my favorite creative writing contest of all time! It's epic, because it tests both your creativity and your endurance. It's called the 15 For 15 Contest, and it is hosted by a member of Writing.com. (The contest is full, but if you're interested in playing along in future rounds, it usually runs once every six months. You have to be a member of the site, which is free. Details HERE.)
The contest moderator posts a new picture prompt every morning. Contestants are challenged to write something: a piece of flash fiction, a poem, song lyrics, a vignette, a dialog-only scene -- anything, based on the photo, and post their work in the contest forum. The biggest challenge? You are only allowed to write for 15 minutes. (We follow the honor system, but most of us are serious writers who love rising to this challenge.) Here's why it's a test of endurance: The contest lasts 15 days, hence the title "15 For 15." Believe me, into the second week your muse gets very tired!
As you can imagine, even the best typers can only type so fast. I'm around 90 words per minute, when I'm on a serious writing high, so my longest entries are around 1300 words. Many are much shorter, depending on the level of my inspiration. I'll post my entries here -- probably. We'll see...
Lastly, although I really dig this blog template, there are a lot of things I don't like about it (narrow post field, only two columns, heavy use of olive green, lack of tabs...) I know, I know -- I'm the worst kind of fickle creative type out there! I'm definitely going to change my layout, again. Bear with me. I'm a Libra; I need beautiful, calm, organized surroundings, even in my cyber-life. (I knew you'd understand :D)
I'm off to contemplate the first 15 For 15 prompt, and to enjoy the last days of the snow. Supposed to get above freezing on Saturday. (The kids have their fingers crossed for no school again tomorrow. If that happens, throwing in two weekends and Martin Luther King, Jr. Day on Monday, they will have had 10 straight days without school. That's a lot of lost creative/computer time for me.) Since 49 states had snow this week, I assume you have been walking around in my shoes too. Hang in there!
I haven't been online for longer than five minutes since last Friday. I look forward to reading some blogs today!
As for my own blog, I will keep this short with just a couple updates.
First, I have a new email account which will replace the one I have been using [heftynicki(at)writing(dot)com] for all my writerly correspondences. The writing dot com email account will not close and I check it several times a day, so no worries if you contact me through that site. But my new, "professional" email account will now be: NicoleDucleroir(at)gmail(dot)com.
Second, today begins my favorite creative writing contest of all time! It's epic, because it tests both your creativity and your endurance. It's called the 15 For 15 Contest, and it is hosted by a member of Writing.com. (The contest is full, but if you're interested in playing along in future rounds, it usually runs once every six months. You have to be a member of the site, which is free. Details HERE.)
The contest moderator posts a new picture prompt every morning. Contestants are challenged to write something: a piece of flash fiction, a poem, song lyrics, a vignette, a dialog-only scene -- anything, based on the photo, and post their work in the contest forum. The biggest challenge? You are only allowed to write for 15 minutes. (We follow the honor system, but most of us are serious writers who love rising to this challenge.) Here's why it's a test of endurance: The contest lasts 15 days, hence the title "15 For 15." Believe me, into the second week your muse gets very tired!
As you can imagine, even the best typers can only type so fast. I'm around 90 words per minute, when I'm on a serious writing high, so my longest entries are around 1300 words. Many are much shorter, depending on the level of my inspiration. I'll post my entries here -- probably. We'll see...
Lastly, although I really dig this blog template, there are a lot of things I don't like about it (narrow post field, only two columns, heavy use of olive green, lack of tabs...) I know, I know -- I'm the worst kind of fickle creative type out there! I'm definitely going to change my layout, again. Bear with me. I'm a Libra; I need beautiful, calm, organized surroundings, even in my cyber-life. (I knew you'd understand :D)
I'm off to contemplate the first 15 For 15 prompt, and to enjoy the last days of the snow. Supposed to get above freezing on Saturday. (The kids have their fingers crossed for no school again tomorrow. If that happens, throwing in two weekends and Martin Luther King, Jr. Day on Monday, they will have had 10 straight days without school. That's a lot of lost creative/computer time for me.) Since 49 states had snow this week, I assume you have been walking around in my shoes too. Hang in there!
Friday, January 7, 2011
Who's Got Your Back?
After my Dead Hard Drive Scare a couple weeks ago, I realized it was time to face facts: I am one of those people who don't back up my computer files.
I upload a great deal of my writing to my online portfolio at Writing.com, and I save work on my WIP at the end of every writing session to a USB Flash Drive. But here's the whole truth: I start a lot of stories that never get out of the idea stage. Their documents sit in files I've never backed up. Only about 10% of all my digital photos are archived at Shutterfly.com. The other 90% are on my hard drive. Not backed up.
I believe personal hard drives and home storage devices of all kinds are endangered species, as much so as paper books and CD/DVDs. The future is all streamed, all virtual. Including our data file storage.
Today I started researching online computer file back-up options. I knew about Carbonite from word-of-mouth and then a recent TV commercial, so I started at their website. Then I Googled 'online backup' and a slew of companies and articles popped up. I had no idea there were so many options to choose from.
Here's what I've learned: Finding the right online backup company comes down to deciding what features are most important to you. Things to consider are:
How many PCs do you own to be backed up?
Do you have only Microsoft machines, only Apple machines, or both?
How much data (or how many gigabytes [GBs]) do you envision backing up?
And, do you want to be able to share backed up files (ie: photo albums or Word Docs) with other, remote users?
I read a thorough article by Michael Muchmore for PCMAG.com (published 10/28/2010) discussing the site editors' top online backup picks. (Read the whole article here -- seriously, it's great!) Basically, it boiled down to this:
Carbonite 4.0
For $54.99 per year, you get unlimited storage for just ONE PC. Muchmore says, "Carbonite is a mature online backup service, but it lacks many desirable features you'll find in the competition. It offers unlimited remote backup storage, and handily marks backed-up files in Windows Explorer. It also has a good Mac version and a so-so iPhone app. But an account only covers one PC and its backup servers aren't geographically redundant. It also lacks file sharing or viewing, live protection, and doesn't back up external or network drives."
IDrive (Spring 2010)
For $4.95 per month per PC, you get 150GB storage space. Muchmore says, "IDrive's support for up to five computers in one account, version saving, Web interface and fast operation are welcome, but you can't mix Macs and PCs, and there are still some rough edges, compared with the competition. Still, the service is much improved since our last review."
MiMedia (Beta)
For $10 per month, you get 50GB storage space on unlimited PCs. Muchmore says, "Already-impressive beta service MiMedia offers hands-off, automated backup, the ability to play media files online, and a cloud-based disk drive. For more control over the upload process and backup set, SOS has it beat, and for simple syncing, DropBox is a better bet. But if you want anywhere access to your digital media, you could do a lot worse than the reasonably priced and well-designed MiMedia."
MozyHome 2.0
For $54.95 per year for only ONE PC. Muchmore says, "Mozy improves ease of use and setup, but still supports just one computer per account and doesn't let you back up network or removable drives. That keeps it a step behind the competition."
Norton Online Backup 2.0
For $50 per year you get 50GB storage on up to 5 PCs. Muchmore says, "With this release, Norton has brought its online backup service's features into the mainstream. Support for multiple PCs, including Macs, in one account and a slick Web-based user interface make this a Norton Online Backup 2.0 a real contender."
SOS Online Backup Home Edition 4.7.4
For $9.95 per month for 5 PCs and up to 50GB. Muchmore says, "SOS still offers more than other online backup providers: multiple PC coverage, external and network drive backup, a local backup app, and an excellent iPhone app. Its Live Protect that watches folders for file changes and backs up immediately. In sum, SOS delivers more than any other online backup service."
Personally, I feel myself leaning toward Norton, because I have been very happy with their Anti-Virus software for years and trust in the quality of their company. Also, I work on a Microsoft desktop now but anticipate adding a MacBook to my office (well, I dream of the day...), so I like that Norton interfaces both platforms.
Most of these companies offer free trial versions. I'm considering trying a couple out. The advantage to this, in addition to prolonging the time when I actually have to pay for the service :p, is that I will be able to make a more informed decision. The disadvantage is spreading my data across corners of cyberspace. I mean, these companies swear their storage centers are super-encrypted and secure, but, come on. Hackers are like cockroaches. They can squeeze into impossibly small access spaces. My files = my identity, after all.
I upload a great deal of my writing to my online portfolio at Writing.com, and I save work on my WIP at the end of every writing session to a USB Flash Drive. But here's the whole truth: I start a lot of stories that never get out of the idea stage. Their documents sit in files I've never backed up. Only about 10% of all my digital photos are archived at Shutterfly.com. The other 90% are on my hard drive. Not backed up.
I believe personal hard drives and home storage devices of all kinds are endangered species, as much so as paper books and CD/DVDs. The future is all streamed, all virtual. Including our data file storage.
Today I started researching online computer file back-up options. I knew about Carbonite from word-of-mouth and then a recent TV commercial, so I started at their website. Then I Googled 'online backup' and a slew of companies and articles popped up. I had no idea there were so many options to choose from.
Here's what I've learned: Finding the right online backup company comes down to deciding what features are most important to you. Things to consider are:
How many PCs do you own to be backed up?
Do you have only Microsoft machines, only Apple machines, or both?
How much data (or how many gigabytes [GBs]) do you envision backing up?
And, do you want to be able to share backed up files (ie: photo albums or Word Docs) with other, remote users?
I read a thorough article by Michael Muchmore for PCMAG.com (published 10/28/2010) discussing the site editors' top online backup picks. (Read the whole article here -- seriously, it's great!) Basically, it boiled down to this:
Carbonite 4.0
For $54.99 per year, you get unlimited storage for just ONE PC. Muchmore says, "Carbonite is a mature online backup service, but it lacks many desirable features you'll find in the competition. It offers unlimited remote backup storage, and handily marks backed-up files in Windows Explorer. It also has a good Mac version and a so-so iPhone app. But an account only covers one PC and its backup servers aren't geographically redundant. It also lacks file sharing or viewing, live protection, and doesn't back up external or network drives."
IDrive (Spring 2010)
For $4.95 per month per PC, you get 150GB storage space. Muchmore says, "IDrive's support for up to five computers in one account, version saving, Web interface and fast operation are welcome, but you can't mix Macs and PCs, and there are still some rough edges, compared with the competition. Still, the service is much improved since our last review."
MiMedia (Beta)
For $10 per month, you get 50GB storage space on unlimited PCs. Muchmore says, "Already-impressive beta service MiMedia offers hands-off, automated backup, the ability to play media files online, and a cloud-based disk drive. For more control over the upload process and backup set, SOS has it beat, and for simple syncing, DropBox is a better bet. But if you want anywhere access to your digital media, you could do a lot worse than the reasonably priced and well-designed MiMedia."
MozyHome 2.0
For $54.95 per year for only ONE PC. Muchmore says, "Mozy improves ease of use and setup, but still supports just one computer per account and doesn't let you back up network or removable drives. That keeps it a step behind the competition."
Norton Online Backup 2.0
For $50 per year you get 50GB storage on up to 5 PCs. Muchmore says, "With this release, Norton has brought its online backup service's features into the mainstream. Support for multiple PCs, including Macs, in one account and a slick Web-based user interface make this a Norton Online Backup 2.0 a real contender."
SOS Online Backup Home Edition 4.7.4
For $9.95 per month for 5 PCs and up to 50GB. Muchmore says, "SOS still offers more than other online backup providers: multiple PC coverage, external and network drive backup, a local backup app, and an excellent iPhone app. Its Live Protect that watches folders for file changes and backs up immediately. In sum, SOS delivers more than any other online backup service."
Personally, I feel myself leaning toward Norton, because I have been very happy with their Anti-Virus software for years and trust in the quality of their company. Also, I work on a Microsoft desktop now but anticipate adding a MacBook to my office (well, I dream of the day...), so I like that Norton interfaces both platforms.
Most of these companies offer free trial versions. I'm considering trying a couple out. The advantage to this, in addition to prolonging the time when I actually have to pay for the service :p, is that I will be able to make a more informed decision. The disadvantage is spreading my data across corners of cyberspace. I mean, these companies swear their storage centers are super-encrypted and secure, but, come on. Hackers are like cockroaches. They can squeeze into impossibly small access spaces. My files = my identity, after all.
Anyone all ready using online backup? I'm interested in recommendations and hearing your experiences. Please share!
Labels:
digital storage,
online backup
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
I Can Handle the Truth
I'm working on a short story I wrote a couple months ago, using it as a way to get my creative motivation running at high idle again after the long holiday interruption. This story drew some of the best critique notes I've ever received, and I'm referencing them as I revise.
My reviewer talked extensively about the characters. In the opening scene, the MC does a reckless, dispicable thing. It's something "normal," "well-adjusted" people may secretly be tempted to do, but should never actually do because the potential for numerous, disastrous outcomes is so blatant. But MC isn't "normal" or "well-adjusted," and one of my tasks was to make him believable and endearing to the reader. According to my reviewer, I scored a slam-dunk with the MC. It was the supporting cast that needs work.
Reviewer said, "There didn't seem to be much of Virginia (a secondary character) beyond the typical wino, but I think you mean for there to be. And I think that’s awesome. I love when a rugged character---someone people usually sneer at, like a wino---has a deeper meaning within them. The fact that she did take (MC) in says she has that, maybe, but I’d like to know for sure. I’d like to see it."
And Reviewer is so right! I'm now excited about digging deeper into Virginia's character.
The critique went on to discuss a sideline character: "Now, to me, the irate lady in the parking lot was the most real. Ohh, I wanted to slap her upside the head, but man, I know that woman. Thinks she’s doing good, but goes about it in all the wrong way with all the wrong attitude. It’s a kind of person that frustrates me, personally, to freakin’ death. And so I loved that she was in the story, making me feel that, wanting to stand between her and Rocco (the MC) and tell her to shove her cell phone up her---"
And it was this observation that got me thinking: What kind of reader am I?
Do I embrace a character I'm reading, accepting them for the person the author wrote? Or do I judge them, doubting someone would act they way the character is behaving or say the things the character does? The deeper I delved into these questions, the more I realized my answer is....both.
I thought about The Almost Moon, by Alice Sebold. I really enjoyed that book and, with absolute abandon, devoured the characters and plots. I swallowed them whole, relished their tastes and textures, never wishing for a dash of salt or to cut them up into smaller, more manageable pieces. For me, Sebold showed in that book her mastery as a character-driven author.
Other people in my book club HATED the book. The most common complaint was readers couldn't relate to Helen, the main character. They felt Helen was a wholly unbelievable character, since she acted in ways most readers rejected as cruel and unrealistic.
And then I started thinking about The Shack, by William P. Young. (Please brace yourselves for my minority opinions of this book, and be advised of my upcoming spoilers.)
I was completely frustrated by this book and actually threw it across the room when I finished it. Why? Because I couldn't believe that Mack spend an entire weekend holed up with the Blessed Trinity -- an exclusive audience with God, Jesus, and The Holy Spirit -- after his five-year-old daughter was brutally raped and murdered -- and he never ever once asked God/Jesus/HolySpirit about the Devil. Not one question. Not even, "Did the Devil make the murderer act?" Mack didn't bring up the Devil's name ONCE. Sorry, but if I had a whole weekend face-to-face with God, and I was a church-going man who'd wavered in his faith in the wake of such an evil atrocity, I would have wanted to know God's take on the Devil.
So, why do I accept some characters as the authors portrayed them and reject others? I suppose it depends on the ability of the author to reach me, to unwittingly tap into my past experiences and my brand of reality.
But I also think an author who is successful in winning his character over with the reader is an author who writes that character's truth. All of it. I may not like what a character is doing, but if he is acting from the gut of his truth, I'm going to embrace him, and stay engaged in his story, until the bitter end.
Sebold wrote all of Helen's ugly truths, masterfully balancing them out with Helen's compassion and wit. And this is what I have to do with Virginia, in my short story. Find her truth. Once I know it, I'll be able to deliver her with more depth and vibrancy than I did in the original draft. And I think that if Young had been bold enough to explore all of Mack's truths, I would have enjoyed The Shack much more than I did.
My reviewer talked extensively about the characters. In the opening scene, the MC does a reckless, dispicable thing. It's something "normal," "well-adjusted" people may secretly be tempted to do, but should never actually do because the potential for numerous, disastrous outcomes is so blatant. But MC isn't "normal" or "well-adjusted," and one of my tasks was to make him believable and endearing to the reader. According to my reviewer, I scored a slam-dunk with the MC. It was the supporting cast that needs work.
Reviewer said, "There didn't seem to be much of Virginia (a secondary character) beyond the typical wino, but I think you mean for there to be. And I think that’s awesome. I love when a rugged character---someone people usually sneer at, like a wino---has a deeper meaning within them. The fact that she did take (MC) in says she has that, maybe, but I’d like to know for sure. I’d like to see it."
And Reviewer is so right! I'm now excited about digging deeper into Virginia's character.
The critique went on to discuss a sideline character: "Now, to me, the irate lady in the parking lot was the most real. Ohh, I wanted to slap her upside the head, but man, I know that woman. Thinks she’s doing good, but goes about it in all the wrong way with all the wrong attitude. It’s a kind of person that frustrates me, personally, to freakin’ death. And so I loved that she was in the story, making me feel that, wanting to stand between her and Rocco (the MC) and tell her to shove her cell phone up her---"
And it was this observation that got me thinking: What kind of reader am I?
Do I embrace a character I'm reading, accepting them for the person the author wrote? Or do I judge them, doubting someone would act they way the character is behaving or say the things the character does? The deeper I delved into these questions, the more I realized my answer is....both.
I thought about The Almost Moon, by Alice Sebold. I really enjoyed that book and, with absolute abandon, devoured the characters and plots. I swallowed them whole, relished their tastes and textures, never wishing for a dash of salt or to cut them up into smaller, more manageable pieces. For me, Sebold showed in that book her mastery as a character-driven author.
Other people in my book club HATED the book. The most common complaint was readers couldn't relate to Helen, the main character. They felt Helen was a wholly unbelievable character, since she acted in ways most readers rejected as cruel and unrealistic.
And then I started thinking about The Shack, by William P. Young. (Please brace yourselves for my minority opinions of this book, and be advised of my upcoming spoilers.)
I was completely frustrated by this book and actually threw it across the room when I finished it. Why? Because I couldn't believe that Mack spend an entire weekend holed up with the Blessed Trinity -- an exclusive audience with God, Jesus, and The Holy Spirit -- after his five-year-old daughter was brutally raped and murdered -- and he never ever once asked God/Jesus/HolySpirit about the Devil. Not one question. Not even, "Did the Devil make the murderer act?" Mack didn't bring up the Devil's name ONCE. Sorry, but if I had a whole weekend face-to-face with God, and I was a church-going man who'd wavered in his faith in the wake of such an evil atrocity, I would have wanted to know God's take on the Devil.
So, why do I accept some characters as the authors portrayed them and reject others? I suppose it depends on the ability of the author to reach me, to unwittingly tap into my past experiences and my brand of reality.
But I also think an author who is successful in winning his character over with the reader is an author who writes that character's truth. All of it. I may not like what a character is doing, but if he is acting from the gut of his truth, I'm going to embrace him, and stay engaged in his story, until the bitter end.
Sebold wrote all of Helen's ugly truths, masterfully balancing them out with Helen's compassion and wit. And this is what I have to do with Virginia, in my short story. Find her truth. Once I know it, I'll be able to deliver her with more depth and vibrancy than I did in the original draft. And I think that if Young had been bold enough to explore all of Mack's truths, I would have enjoyed The Shack much more than I did.
So what about you? What kind of reader are you? Do you question more often than embrace the characters you read?
Labels:
Reading,
The Almost Moon,
The Shack,
Writing
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
I'm over "there" today...
Today, I'm over guest blogging at Carolyn Abiad's Serendipity, for her new series on International Romance.
Join me there, where I share how living in Africa and France with my French husband has affected my (writing) life. There's also a link at the bottom of my article to photos of me in Africa.
The naive girl in this photo is me in 1994, just before I jumped on a plane for what was supposed to be a two-year stint in the Peace Corps. I didn't make it home for almost nine years! (Notice my army duffel bags? I heard everybody would pack their stuff in these types of bags, so I painted happy flowers on mine. It was a good call. About 35 out of 45 of us that went over together had army duffel bags. I never had to search in airports through mountains of drab olive to find my bags!)
See you over at Carolyn's!
Join me there, where I share how living in Africa and France with my French husband has affected my (writing) life. There's also a link at the bottom of my article to photos of me in Africa.
The naive girl in this photo is me in 1994, just before I jumped on a plane for what was supposed to be a two-year stint in the Peace Corps. I didn't make it home for almost nine years! (Notice my army duffel bags? I heard everybody would pack their stuff in these types of bags, so I painted happy flowers on mine. It was a good call. About 35 out of 45 of us that went over together had army duffel bags. I never had to search in airports through mountains of drab olive to find my bags!)
See you over at Carolyn's!
Labels:
Africa,
Guest Blogging,
International Romance,
Peace Corps,
Serendipity
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)